Reportando os resultados das investigações internas

principais modos de cooperação entre empresas e autoridades investigativas em relação a persecução de cidadãos no processo penal

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.829

Palavras-chave:

crimes de colarinho branco; investigações internas; acordos pré-processuais; autoincriminação.

Resumo

Este estudo analisa se as investigações internas realizadas como resultado da cooperação entre a empresa e o Ministério Público podem conflitar com os direitos dos indivíduos no processo penal. Demonstra-se como a era pós-Enron enfatizou a importância das investigações internas como um componente dos sistemas corporativos de compliance criminal em todo o mundo, levando a uma cooperação mais frequente entre empresas e promotores na realização de investigações internas. O objetivo deste artigo é demostrar que isso ocasionou abusos contra indivíduos, que, por serem investigações internas privadas e em grande parte não regulamentadas, não têm as mesmas garantias que em processos criminais. Este artigo visa a avaliar criticamente as regulamentações que foram introduzidas nesta área e demonstrar a necessidade de mudanças legislativas nos países que permitem essa cooperação, mas não consideraram os riscos decorrentes da natureza das investigações internas.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Szymon Pawelec, Faculty of Law and Administration University of Warsaw

    Associate Professor and Head of the Department of International Criminal Procedure at the University of Warsaw, Poland. PhD with habilitation in Law.

Referências

AMULIC Andrea, Humanizing the Corporation While Dehumanizing the Individual: The Misuse of Deferred-Prosecution Agreements in the United States, Michigan Law Review, 2017, p. 123–53. available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44985612

ARLEN Jennifer, Prosecuting Beyond the Rule of Law: Corporate Mandates Imposed through Deferred Prosecution Agreements, Journal of Legal Analysis, 2016, p. 191–234, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/law007, accessed on 19 March 2023

BENNET Robert S., KRIEGEL Alan, RAUGH Carl S., WALKER Charles F., Internal Investigations and the Defense of Corporations in the Sarbanes-Oxley Era, Chicago: The Business Lawyer, 2006, p. 55-88, available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40688411

BOUTROS Andrew., Deferred Prosecution Agreements, Nonprosecution Agreements, and Corporate Integrity Agreements, FUNK T. Markus, BOUTROS Andrew S. Boutros, From Baksheesh to Bribery: Understanding the Global Fight Against Corruption and Graft, New York, Oxford Academic, 2019, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190232399.003.0026

COLE Lance, Reexamining the Collective Entity Doctrine in the New Era of Limited Liability Entities - Should Business Entities Have a Fifth Amendment Privilege, 2005 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2710379

CUMMINGS Lawton P., The Ethical Mine Field: Corporate Internal Investigations and Individual Assertions of the Attorney-Client Privilege, West Virginia: West Virginia Lew Review, 2007, available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol109/iss3/6

DAVIES, Paul L., 'Enron and Corporate Law Reform in the UK and the European Community', in HOPT Klaus J. and others, Corporate Governance in Context: Corporations, States, and Markets in Europe, Japan, and the US, Oxford, Oxford Academic, 2012, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290703.003.0009

DAVIS Frederick T., Judicial Review of Deferred Prosecution Agreements. A comparative study, New York: Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2022, p.752-828, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4072985 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072985

DELANEY Rachel, Congressional Legislation: The Next Step for Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreements, Wisconsin: Marquette Law Review, 2009, available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol93/iss2/19

ELDRED David, The Defense Strikes Back: United States v. Stein–A Significant First Step in Recouping the Rights and Privileges of Targeted Employees, Aspen Publishers, 2007, available at: https://www.dorsey.com/~/media/files/newsresources/publications/2007/02/the-defense-strikes-back-united-states-v-steina __/files/tbls13newspdf952838defensestrikescorporationfeb1__/fileattachment/defensestrikes_corporation_feb15_2007.pdf

GREEN Bruce A., PROGDOR Ellen S., Unregulated Corporate Internal Investigations: Achieving Fairness for Corporate Constituents, Boston: Boston College Law Review, 2013, p.73-126, available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/579/

GRIFFIN Lisa Kern, Compelled Cooperation and the New Corporate Criminal Procedure, New York: New York University Law Review, 2007, p.311-382, available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1919

GRIFFIN Lisa Kern, Inside-Out Enforcement, in BARKOW Anthony S., and BARKOW Rachel E., Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regulate Corporate Conduct, New York: NYU Press Scholarship Online, 2011, available at: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814787038.003.0005

KAAL, Wulf A., and LACINE Timothy A. The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance: Evidence from 1993-2013”, The Business Lawyer, 2014, available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43665690

KEEFE Brendan J., Revisions of the Thompson Memorandum and Avoiding the Stein Problems: A Review of the Federal Policy on the Prosecution of Business Organizations Note, Connecticut: Connecticut Law Review, 2009, p. 273-318, available at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/48

LOTCHIN Theodore R., No Good Deed Goes Unpunished? Establishing a Self-evaluating Privilege for Corporate Internal Investigations, Williamsburg: William & Mary Law Review, 2004, available at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol46/iss3/5

MISSAL Michael., FISHMANN Ed, OCHS, Brian, DUBILL Rebecca Kline Conducting Corporate Criminal Investigations, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2007, p. 297–308 available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jdg.2050065

PATTERSON Sarah, Co-opted Cooperators: Corporate Internal Investigations and Brady v. Maryland, New York: Columbia Business Law Review, 2021, available at: https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/CBLR/article/view/8482

PIETH Mark, IVORY Radha, Corporate Criminal Liability Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Springer, 2011

STEVENS Charles J., CHAN Winston Y. Disclosure of Results of Internal Investigations to the Government or Other Third Parties, available at: https://www.gibsondunn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Stevens-Chan-Disclosure-of-Results-of-Internal-Investigations-to-the-Government-or-Other-Third-Parties-Internal-Corp-Investigations-Dec-2017.pdf

TSAO Leo R., KAHN Daniel S., SOLTES Eugene F., Corporate Internal Investigations and Prosecutions, Aspen Publishing, 2022.

Downloads

Publicado

30.06.2023

Edição

Seção

DOSSIÊ: Processo penal da pessoa jurídica e investigações empresariais internas

Como Citar

Pawelec, S. (2023). Reportando os resultados das investigações internas: principais modos de cooperação entre empresas e autoridades investigativas em relação a persecução de cidadãos no processo penal. Revista Brasileira De Direito Processual Penal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.829