Evaluación crítica de la regulación y el uso de la suspensión condicional del procedimiento en el marco de la persecución penal a personas jurídicas por el delito de soborno en Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.835Palavras-chave:
Acuerdos negociados, investigación de la criminalidad empresarial, responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas, efectividad de la reacción penal, Suspensión condicional del procedimientoResumo
La presente investigación ofrece una evaluación crítica de la utilización, por parte del Ministerio Público en Chile, de las “suspensiones condicionales del procedimiento” a propósito de la investigación y persecución de personas jurídicas por los delitos de soborno cometidos en su interés por sus integrantes. Para tales efectos se analiza la literatura angloamericana especializada en el uso de “acuerdos negociados” como estrategia frente a la criminalidad empresarial, con el propósito de ofrecer una serie de criterios que facilitarían tal evaluación en atención a los objetivos que debiesen guiar la utilización de tales acuerdos como forma de reacción estatal. La investigación concluye detectando una serie de posibles mejoras que podrían incorporarse a la práctica chilena para potenciar la coherencia del uso de tales acuerdos con aquellos objetivos previamente detectados.
Downloads
Referências
ARLEN, Jennifer; BUELL, Samuel. The law of corporate investigations and the global expansion of corporate criminal enforcement. Southern California Law Review, Los Angeles, v. 93, n. 4, p. 697-762, 2020.
ARLEN, Jennifer. Corporate criminal enforcement in the United States: using negotiated settlements to turn potential corporate criminals into corporate cops. Rivista trimestrale di diritto penale dell`economia, Padua, v. 31, n. 1-2, p. 22-40, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2951972
ARLEN, Jennifer. Prosecuting beyond the rule of law: corporate mandates imposed through deferred prosecution agreements. Journal of Legal Analysis, Oxford, v. 8, n. 1, p. 191-234, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609111
ARTAZA, Osvaldo. Una estrategia restaurativa en el ámbito de la responsabilidad penal de personas jurídicas: una aproximación teórica. Derecho PUCP, Lima, n. 88, p. 125-153, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202201.005
BALMACEDA, Gustavo; GUERRA, Rodrigo. Políticas de prevención de delitos en la empresa. Santiago: Thomson Reuters, 2014.
BENNETT, Robert; LOCICERO, Hilary; HANNER, Brooks. From regulation to prosecution to cooperation: trends in corporate white collar crime enforcement and the evolving role of the white collar criminal defense attorney. The Business Lawyer, Chicago, v. 68, n. 2, p. 411-438, 2013.
BERNASCONI, Andreas. Deferred prosecution agreements as magic enforcement tool? Disponible en: <https://lawded.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Deferred-prosecution-agreements-as-magic-enforcement-tool.pdf>. Acceso en: 31 may. 2023.
BU, Qingxiu. The viability of deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) in the UK: the impact on global anti‐bribery compliance. European Business Organization Law Review, London, v. 22, n. 1, p. 173-201, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00203-5
CAÑAS, Macarena. Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas. Suspensión condicional del procedimiento. Industrias Ceresita S.A. Revista Jurídica del Ministerio Público, Santiago, n. 55, p. 79-92, 2013.
CARNEVALI, Raúl. Mecanismos alternativos de solución de conflictos en materia penal en Chile. Una propuesta de lege ferenda, Revista Ius et Praxis, Talca, v. 25, n. 1, p. 415-438, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-00122019000100415
CHEN, Ruihua. Models of criminal procedure system. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3651-7
COFFEE, John. Corporate crime and punishment: the crisis of underenforcement. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2020.
COFFEE, John. Crime and the corporation: making the punishment fit the corporation. The Journal of Corporation Law, Iowa, v. 46, n. 4, p. 965-989, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914961
DAVIS, Kevin. What counts as a good settlement? En: S∅REIDE, Tina; MAKINWA, Abiola (eds.). Negotiated settlements in bribery cases: a principled approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020. p. 260-279. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970419.00020
DUCE, Mauricio; RIEGO, Cristián. Proceso penal. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 2007.
FISCALIA NACIONAL. Oficio FN N°278/2022. Disponible en: http://www.oas.org/es/sla/dlc/mesicic/docs/mesicic6_cl_res_ane38.pdf.
FISCALIA NACIONAL. Oficio FN N°440/2010. Disponible en: <http://www.fiscaliadechile.cl/Fiscalia/archivo?id=778&pid=81&tid=1&d=1>.
GUARDIOLA, María Jesús. ¿Es posible la justicia restaurativa en la delincuencia de cuello blanco?. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, Santiago de Compostela, v. 40, p. 529-591, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15304%2Fepc.40.6695
HAWLEY, Susan; KING, Colin; LORD, Nicholas. Justice for whom? The need for a principled approach to deferred prosecution agreements in England and Wales. En: S∅REIDE, Tina; MAKINWA, Abiola (eds.). Negotiated settlements in bribery cases: a principled approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020. p. 309-346. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970419.00022
HOCK, Branislav. Policing corporate bribery: negotiated settlements and bundling. Policing and Society, London, v. 31, n. 8, p. 950-966, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1808650
HORVITZ, María Inés; LOPEZ, Julián. Derecho procesal penal chileno. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 2003.
IVORY, Radha; S∅REIDE, Tina. The international endorsement of corporate settlements in foreign briber cases. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Cambridge, v. 69, n. 4, p. 945-978, 2020. https://doi:10.1017/S0020589320000329.
JIMENEZ, Gustavo. Corporate criminal liability: toward a compliance-orientated approach. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Indiana, v. 26, n. 1, p. 353-380, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.26.1.0353
KARP, David. Harm and repair: observing restorative justice in Vermont. Justice Quarterly, Greenbelt, v. 18, n. 4, p. 727-757, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100095081
KING, Colin; LORD, Nicholas. Negotiated justice and corporate crime: the legitimacy of civil recovery orders and deferred prosecution agreements. Tunbridge Wells: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78562-2
LORD, Nicholas; WINGERDE, Karin; CAMPBELL, Liz. Organising the monies of corporate financial crimes via organisational structures: ostensible legitimacy, effective anonymity, and third-party facilitation. Administrative Sciences, Basel, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1-17, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020017.
LORD, Nicholas. Prosecution deferred, prosecution exempt: On the Interests of (in)justice in the non-trial resolution of transnational corporate bribery. The British Journal of Criminology, Oxford, v. 20, n. 20, p. 1-19, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac059
LORD, Nicholas. Regulating corporate bribery in international business: anti-corruption in the UK and Germany. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315604497
LUND, Dorothy; SARIN, Natasha. Corporate crime and punishment: an empirical study. Texas Law Review, Texas, v. 100, n. 2, p. 285-352, 2021.
MAKINWA, Abiola. Public/private co-operation in anti-bribery enforcement: non-trial resolutions as a solution?. En: S∅REIDE, Tina; MAKINWA, Abiola (eds.). Negotiated settlements in bribery cases: a principled approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020. p. 42-67. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970419.00011
MATURANA, Cristian; MONTERO, Raúl. Derecho procesal penal: tomo II. Santiago: Legal Publishing Chile, 2010.
MILLER, Marc; WRIGHT, Ronald. The black box. Iowa Law Review, Iowa, v. 94, n. 1, p. 125-196, 2008.
MIR PUIG, Santiago. Derecho penal. Parte general. Buenos Aires: BdeF, 2005.
MONACO, Lisa. Further revisions to corporate criminal enforcement policies following discussions with corporate crime advisory group. Disponible en: <https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/file/1535301/download>. Acceso en: 25 mar. 2023.
NACIONES UNIDAS, Convención de las naciones unidas contra la corrupción. Viena: Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito, 2004.
NAVAS, Iván; JAAR, Antonia. La responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas en la jurisprudencia chilena. Política Criminal, Talca, v. 13, n. 26, p. 1027-1054, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992018000201027
NIETO, Adán. Justicia empresarial restaurativa y víctimas corporativas. La legislazione penale, n. 1, p. 277-304, 2021.
PARKER, Megan; DODGE, Mary. An exploratory study of deferred prosecution agreements and the adjudication of corporate crime. Journal of Financial Crime, Bingley, v. 30, n. 4, p. 940-954, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-06-2022-0122
PARKER, Megan. The adoption of deferred prosecution agreements to adjudicate corporate crime: a qualitative analysis. Tesis (Magíster en Justicia Criminal) – Universidad de Colorado, Denver, 2018.
PEREZ, Michael. The rise and globalization of negotiated settlements: how an American procedure, the deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), became a transnational key tool to fight transnational corporate crimes. Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Center Journal, Doha, v. 2020, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5339/rolacc.2020.4
PIQUERO, Nicole; RICE, Stephen; PIQUERO, Alex. Power, profit, and pluralism: new avenues for research on restorative justice and whithe-collar crime. En: VENTURA, Holly (ed.). Restorative justice: from theory to practice. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2008. p. 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1521-6136(08)00409-0.
REILLY, Peter. Justice deferred is justice denied: we must end our failed experiment in deferring corporate criminal prosecutions. BYU Law Review, Provo, v. 15, n. 2, p. 307-358, 2015.
REILLY, Peter. Sweetheart deals, deferred prosecution, and making a mockery of the criminal justice system: U.S. corporate DPAs rejected on many fronts. Arizona State Law Journal, Phoenix, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1113-1170, 2018.
WERLE, Nick. Prosecuting corporate crime when firms are too big to jail: investigation, deterrence, and judicial review. The Yale Law Journal, New Haven, v. 128, n. 5, p. 1366-1438, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3216152
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Osvaldo Artaza, Braulio Carrasco
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação, impressa e/ou digital.
Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de auto-plágio.
- Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação, além do link DOI para referência cruzada. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Por se tratar de periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais e científicas desde que citada a fonte, conforme a licença da Creative Commons.
A partir de 2022, os artigos publicados na RDPP estão licenciados com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Os artigos puliicados até 2021 adotaram a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
---------------
Arquivamento e distribuição
Permite-se sem restrições o arquivamento do PDF final publicado, em qualquer servidor de acesso aberto, indexador, repositório ou site pessoal, como Academia.edu e ResearchGate.
Como Citar
