Reabilitação e transferência internacional de prisioneiros e pessoas sujeitas a medidas restritivas e penas alternativas: uma questão problemática para a cooperação judiciária na UE em matéria penal

Stefano Montaldo

doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v5i2.245

Autores

Stefano Montaldo Assistant Professor of EU Law at the University of Turin – Italy http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-6454

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v5i2.245

Palavras-chave:

reabilitação de condenados, confiança recíproca, transferências insternacionais, limites, direitos fundamentais.

Resumo

O artigo analisa a função da noção de reabilitação dos condenados nos mecanismos de cooperação judiciária da União Europeia, com especial ênfase nas transferências internacionais. Em primeiro lugar, fornece-se uma visão geral da abordagem da ordem jurídica da UE e do sistema da Convenção Europeia de Direitos Humanos sobre este tema. Argumenta-se que a reabilitação dos condenados é uma noção cada vez mais importante em nível supranacional, capaz de impor deveres progressivamente mais restritivos às autoridades policiais domésticas. Em segundo lugar, analisa-se a forma como os objetivos de reabilitação afetam as escolhas normativas subjacentes à Decisão-Quadro 2008/909/GAI, relativa às transferências de reclusos entre os Estados-Membros e à Decisão-Quadro 2008/947/GAI, relativa ao reconhecimento mútuo de medidas de vigilância e penas alternativas. O artigo sustenta que a reabilitação dos condenados ainda está buscando um papel claro na ordem jurídica da UE, como demonstrado pela recente jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça. Em particular, o funcionamento dos mecanismos de cooperação judiciária e as orientações jurisprudenciais fornecidas pelo Tribunal confirmam que este objetivo da punição tem relação com a plena eficácia do direito da UE e com a vontade oculta dos Estados-Membros de utilizarem as transferências transfronteiras como um instrumento de controle de mobilidade interna na UE.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

Stefano Montaldo, Assistant Professor of EU Law at the University of Turin – Italy

Assistant Professor of EU Law at the University of Turin – Italy

Referências

CANTON, Rob; FLYNN, Nick; WOODS, Joe. Social Rehabilitation Through the Prison Gate, available at http://steps2.europris.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Annex-4.12.-Workstream-3-Social-Rehabilitation-Through-the-Prison-Gate.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2019.

COMBESSIE, Philippe Ouverture des prisons jusqu'à quel point?. In VEIL, Claude; LHUILIER, Dominique (eds). La prison en changement. Toulouse: Erès, 2000, p. 69.

DDALMULIRA MUJUZI, Jamil. The Transfer of Offenders Between European Countries and Remission of Sentence. European Criminal Law Review, 2017, p. 289.

DE WREE, Eveline; VERMEULEN, Gert; VANDER BEKEN, Tom. The Transfer of Sentenced Persons in Europe. Much Ado About Reintegration. Punishment and Society, 2009, p. 111.

DURNESCU, Ioan, Obstacles and Solutions in the implementation of the FD 2008/909/JHA, report of the STEPS2 Resettlement project, 2016, available at http://steps2.europris.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Annex-4.6.-Workstream-1-Obstacles-and-Solutions-in-the-implementation-of-the-FD-2008909JHA.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2019.

DURNESCU, Ioan. Framework Decisions 2008/947 and 2009/829: State of Play and Challenges. In ERA Forum, 2017, p. 355.

DURNESCU, Ioan; MONTERO, Ester; RAVAGNANI, Luisa. Prisoner transfer and the importance of the release effect. Crimonology and Crimnal Justice, 2017, p. 450.

FARALDO CABANA, Patricia. One step forward, two steps back? Social rehabilitation of foreign offenders under Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA. New Journal of European Criminal Law, forthcoming.

FROMENT, Jean-Charles. Les avatars de la Convention sur le transfèrement de détenus en Europe. In CERÉ, Jean (ed.), Panorama européen de la prison. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2002, p. 33.

GARLAND, David. The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

KNAPEN, Marije. Implementation of Framework Decisions on the Enforcement of Foreign Criminal Judgments: (How) Can the Aim of Resocialisation be Achieved?. In GROENHUIJSEN, Mark; KOOIJMANS, Tijs; DE ROOS, Theo (eds). Fervet Opus. Liber Amicorum Anton van Kalmthout. Anvers: Maklu, 2010, p. 113.

MANCANO, Leandro. The Right to Liberty in European Union Law andMutual Recognition in Criminal Matters. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 2016, p. 215.

MANCANO, Leandro. The Place of Prisoners in European Union Law?. European Public Law, 2016, p. 717.

MARGUERY, Tony. EU Citizenship and European Arrest Warrant: The Same Rights for All?. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 2009, p. 84.

MARGUERY, Tony. Towards the end of mutual trust? Prison conditions in the context of the European Arrest Warrant and the transfer of prisoners. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2018, p. 704.

MARTUFI, Adriano. Assessing the Resilience of Social Rehabilitation as a Rationale for Transfer: A Commentary on the Aims of Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2018, p. 43.

MARTUFI, Adriano. The Paths of Offender Rehabilitation and the European Dimension of Punishment: New Challenges for an Old Ideal?. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2018, p. 1.

MCNEILL, Fergus. A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice , 2006, p. 39.

MELISSARIS, Emmanuel. Theories of Crime and Punishment. In DUBBER, Markus; HÖRNLE, Tatjana (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 355.

MITSILEGAS, Valsamis. EU Criminal Law after Lisbon. Rights, Trust and Transformation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016, p. 222.

MONTALDO, Stefano. I limiti della cooperazione in materia penale nell'Unione europea. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2015.

NEVEU, Suliane. Probation Measures and Alternative Sanctions in Europe: From the 1964 Convention to the 2008 Framework Decision. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2013, p. 134.

NEVEU, Suliane. Le transfert de l'exécution des peines alternatives et restrictives de liberté en droit européen. A la recherche d'un équilibre entre intérêts individuels et collectifs. Limal: Anthemis, 2016.

PLEIĆ, Marija. Challenges in Cross-border Transfer of Prisoners: EU Framework and Croatian Perspective. In DUIĆ, Dunja; PETRAŠEVIĆ, Tunjica (eds). EU Law in Context. Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement. Osijek: University Josip Juraj Strossmayer, 2018, p. 380.

ROSANÒ, Alessandro. Beshkov. Or the Long Road to the Principle of Social Rehabilitation of Offenders. European Papers, 2018, p. 433.

UGELVIK, Thomas. Seeing Like a Welfare State: Immigration Control, Statecraft, and a Prison with Double Vision. In AAS, Katja Franco; BOSWORTH, Mary (eds). The Borders of Punishment. Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 183.

UGELVIK, Thomas. The Incarceration of Foreigners in European Prisons. In: PICKERING Sharon; HAM, Julie (eds). The Routledge Handbook on Crime and International Migration. London and New York: Routledge, 2014, p. 107.

VAN KEMPEN, Piet Hein; YOUNG, Warren (eds). Prevention of reoffending. The Value of Rehabilitation and the Management of High Risk Offenders. 2014, Cambridge: Intersentia.

VAN ZYL SMIT, Dirk; SNACKEN, Sonia. Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

VERMEULEN, Gert et al., Cross-border Execution of Judgments Involving Deprivation of Liberty in the EU. Overcoming Legal and Practical Problems through Flanking Measures. Anvers: Maklu, 2011.