Admissibilidade da prova e justiça criminal internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.492Palavras-chave:
admissibilidade da prova, tribunais penais internacionais, justiça internacional.Resumo
O processo penal internacional combina elementos das tradições acusatórias e inquisitórias, assim constituindo um paradigma único. Em razão da escala mais ampla e da maior complexidade da criminalidade internacional a ser enfrentada pelos Tribunais criminais internacionais, pode ser interessante observar os seus desenvolvimentos e históricos diante da temática da admissibilidade probatória. Neste artigo pretende-se analisar a legislação e a prática dos Tribunais Internacionais Militares, os Tribunais Penais Internacionais para a antiga Iugoslávia e para Ruanda, e o Tribunal Penal Internacional, além de apontar comentários gerais sobre admissibilidade da prova em uma perspectiva internacional ampla, ou seja, não somente limitada a órgãos judiciais internacionais de caráter penal.Downloads
Referências
ACQUAVIVA, GUIDO. Written and oral evidence. In: CARTER, Linda; POCAR, Fausto (eds.). International Criminal procedure: The Interface of Civil Law and Common Law Legal Systems, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2013.
AMBOS, Kai. International Criminal Procedure: “Adversarial”, “Inquisitorial” or Mixed? In: BOHLANDER Michael (ed.). International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and Procedures, London: Cameron May, 2007.
AMBOS, Kai. Treatise on International Criminal Law: Volume III: International Criminal Procedure. Oxford: OUP, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199665617.001.0001
AMERASINGHE, Chittharanjan F. Evidence in International Litigation. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.
BIBAS, Stephanos; BURKE-WHITE, William W. International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 59(4), 2010.
BITTI, Gilbert. Article 64. In: TRIFFTERER, Otto; AMBOS, Kai (eds.). The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Third Edition. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263571-1589
BOAS, Gideon. Admissibility of Evidence Under the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTY: Development of the “Flexibility Principle”. In: MAY, Richard et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
BOAS, Gideon; BISCHOFF, James L.; REID Natalie L.; TAYLOR III, B. Don. International Criminal Law Practitioner Library: International Criminal Procedure, Volume 3, Cambridge: CUP 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760563.010
BOISTER, Neil; CRYER, Robert (eds.). Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: Charter, Indictment and Judgments. Oxford: OUP 2008.
BRADY, Helen. The System of Evidence in the Statute of the International Criminal Court. In: LATTANZI, Flavia; SCHABAS, William A. (eds.). Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Volume 1, Il Sirente, 1999.
BROWER, Charles N. The Anatomy of Fact-Finding before International Tribunals: An Analysis and a Proposal Concerning the Evaluation of Evidence. In: LILLICH, Richard (ed.). Fact-Finding by International Tribunals. Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers, 1991.
CASSESE, Antonio. The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.1.144
COGAN, Jacob Katz. The Problem of Obtaining Evidence for International Criminal Courts, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 22, no. 2, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2000.0021
CHENG, Bin. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge: CUP, 2006.
COMBS, Nancy. Evidence. In: SCHABAS, William A.; BERNAZ, Nadia (eds.). Routledge Handbook of International Criminal Law. New York: Routledge, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836897.ch20
COMBS, Nancy Amoury. Grave crimes and weak evidence: A fact-finding evolution in international criminal law, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 58, 2017.
DRUMBL, Mark A. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law, Cambridge: CUP 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511611100
FALLAH, Sara Mansour. The Admissibility of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence before International Courts and Tribunals, The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Vol. 19, 2020, p. 148. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341420
FLETCHER, George P. The Interplay of International Criminal Law and Other Bodies of Law, The Influence of the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions on International Criminal Law. In: CASSESE, Antonio (ed.). The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
GALLMETZER, Reinhold. The Trial Chamber’s Discretionary Power To Devise The Proceedings Before It And Its Exercise In The Trial Of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. In: STAHN, Carsten; SLUITER, Goran (eds.). The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court. Leiden: Brill, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.144
GOODHART, Arthur L. The Legality of the Nuremberg Trials. In: METTRAUX, Guénaël. Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial. Oxford: OUP 2008.
GOSNELL, Christopher. Admissibility of Evidence. In: KHAN, Karim A.A.; BUISMAN, Caroline; GOSNELL, Christopher (eds.). Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford: OUP, 2010.
HUDSON, Manley O. International Tribunals. Past and Future. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Brookings Institution, 1944.
HUNT, David. The International Criminal. Court. High Hopes, ‘Creative Ambiguity’ and an Unfortunate Mistrust in International Judges. Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 2, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.1.56
JASIŃSKI, Wojciech. Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Proceedings before International Criminal Courts. In: KRZAN, Bartłomiej (ed.). Prosecuting International Crimes: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004323667_011
KAZAZI, Mojtaba. Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence Before International Tribunals. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996.
KLAMBERG, Mark. Evidence in International Criminal Trials. Leiden: Brill, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004236523
KRESS, Claus. The Procedural Law of the International Criminal Court in Outline: Anatomy of a Unique Compromise. Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/1.3.603
KWON, O-Gon. The Challenge of An International Criminal Trial as Seen from the Bench. Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql094
MACDONALD, Gabrielle Kirk. Trial Procedures and Practices, in MACDONALD, Gabrielle Kirk; SWAAK-GOLDMAN Olivia. Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts. Vol. 1, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
MAY, Richard; WIERDA, Marieke. International Criminal Evidence, Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 2002.
MAY, Richard; WIERDA, Marieke. Trends in International Criminal Evidence: Nuremberg, Tokyo, The Hague, and Arusha, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 37, 1999.
MURPHY, Peter. Evidence, Proof, and Facts - A Book of Sources. Oxford: OUP, 2003.
MURPHY, Peter. Excluding justice or facilitating justice? International criminal law would benefit from rules of evidence. International Journal Evidence and Proof, Vol. 12, 2008.
MURPHY, Peter. No Free Lunch, No Free Proof: The Indiscriminate Admission of Evidence is a Serious Flaw in International Criminal Trials. Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq029
ORIE, Alphons. Accusatorial versus Inquisitorial Approach in International Criminal Proceedings. In: CASSESE, Antonio; GAETA, Paola; JONES, John R.W.D. (eds.). The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary. Oxford: OUP, 2002.
OSIEL, Mark. Making Sense of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge: CUP, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596575
PIRAGOFF, Donald K. Evidence. In LEE, R.S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court—Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, 2001.
PIRAGOFF, Donald K.; CLARKE, Paula. Article 69. In: TRIFFTERER, Otto; AMBOS, Kai (eds.). The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Third Edition. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263571-1713
RIDELL, Anna.Evidence, Fact-Finding, and Experts. In: ROMANO, Cesare P.R.; ALTER, Karin; SHANY, Yuval (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: OUP, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0039
SANDIFER, Durward V. Evidence Before International Tribunals. Chicago: The Foundation Press, 1939.
SCHABAS, William A. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Second Edition. Oxford: OUP, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849469982.part-006
SCHUON, Christine. The Appeals Decision in the ICC’s Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo Case on the Trial Chamber’s ‘Decision on the Admission into Evidence of Materials Contained in the Prosecution’s List of Evidence’. Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 25, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156512000180
SWART, Bert. International criminal courts and the admissibility of evidence. In: THAKUR, R. Chandra; MALCONTENT, Peter (eds.). From Sovereign Impunity to International Accountability: The Search for Justice in a World of States. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2004.
TAYLOR, Telford. The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. London: Bloomsbury 1993.
WALLACH, Evan J. The Procedural and Evidentiary Rules of the Post-World War II Crimes Trials: Did They Provide an Outline for International Legal Procedure. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 37, 1999.
ZAHAR Alexander; SLUITER, Goran. International Criminal Law: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: OUP, 2008.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação, impressa e/ou digital.
Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de auto-plágio.
- Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação, além do link DOI para referência cruzada. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Por se tratar de periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais e científicas desde que citada a fonte, conforme a licença da Creative Commons.
A partir de 2022, os artigos publicados na RDPP estão licenciados com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Os artigos puliicados até 2021 adotaram a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
---------------
Arquivamento e distribuição
Permite-se sem restrições o arquivamento do PDF final publicado, em qualquer servidor de acesso aberto, indexador, repositório ou site pessoal, como Academia.edu e ResearchGate.
Como Citar
