La fundamentación de la defensa por medio de las ciencias forenses en el marco del procedimiento penal en Rumanía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.302Palabras clave:
Examen forense, Ciencias forenses, Función de la defensa, Ente de investigación, Fase de investigación.Resumen
La función de la defensa en el procedimiento penal en Rumanía es el resultado de la separación tradicional de las tres funciones procesales de acusación, enjuiciamiento y defensa. Más allá de los límites del principio de contradicción que caracteriza el procedimiento penal en Rumanía, los órganos de investigación están interesados tanto en encontrar la verdad en los asuntos penales como en resolverlos jurídica y sustantivamente. Ambos objetivos se logran en el procedimiento penal por medio de pruebas obtenidas legalmente por parte de los entes jurisdiccionales. En este artículo pretendo identificar los elementos que contribuyen a lograr la función de la defensa en el procedimiento penal en Rumanía mediante el uso de instrumentos y técnicas de las ciencias forenses. Para alcanzar los objetivos propuestos, se ha empleado una metodología de investigación mixta, basada en un método cualitativo.Descargas
Referencias
ALAMOREANU, Sorin, Problematica expertizei criminalistice, Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2013.
AMZA, Tudor, Criminologie teoretica, Bucharest: Lumina Lex, 2000.
BENSCHOP, Corina C. G.; HOOGENBOOM, Jerry; HOVERS, Pauline; SLAGTER, Martin; KRUISE, Dennis; PARAG, Raymond; STEENSMA, Kristy; SLOOTEN, Klaas; NAGEL, Jord H. A.; DIELTJES, Patrick; MARION, Vincent van ; PAASSEN, Heidi van; JONG, Jeroen de; CREETEN, Christophe; SIJEN, Titia; KNEPPERS, Alexander L. J., DNAxs/DNAStatistX: Development and validation of a software suite for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles, Forensic Science International: Genetics, vol. 42/2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.015
CAMPOBASSO, Carlo Pietro; INTRONA, Francesco. The forensic entomologist in the context of the forensic patologist's role, Forensic Science International, vol. 120/2001, pp. 132-139. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00425-X
CARPINEAN, Ion Cristian, Rolul Probelor Criminalistice in Stabilirea Adevarului, Revista de Criminologie, Criminalistica si Penologie, Issue 4/2019.
CASSEL, Paul G.; BOYCE, Ronald N., Crime victims' rights. In: LUNA, Erik (ed.) Reforming Criminal Justice: Pretrial and Trial Processes, Arizona State University, Phoenix, 2017, available online at: https://law.asu.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academy_for_justice/Reforming-Criminal-Justice_Vol_3.pdf (accessed on 9 January 2020)
CATARAGA, Olga; ALAMOREANU, Sorin; PETCOVICI, Piotr, Examinarea documentelor prezentate in copie. Aspecte practice si teortice, Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, Issue 1/2019.
COLLINS, Rachael E., Applying Meta-Analysis to Criminological Research: A Step-by-Step Approach, London: SAGE Publications, 2017, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473994782
COMAN, Andreea, Forta probanta a raportului de expertiza in procesul penal, 2019, available online at: https://www.juridice.ro/649822/forta-probanta-a-raportului-de-expertiza-in-procesul-penal.html (accessed on 17 November 2019)
CORREIA, Sara Giro, Responding to victimisation in a digital world: a case study of fraud and computer misuse reported in Wales, Crime Science, vol. 8 Issue 4/2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-019-0099-7
DARTNALL, Stephanie; GOODMAN-DELAHUNTY, Jane, Enhancing Juror Understanding of Probabilistic DNA Evidence, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Taylor & Francis vol. 38/2006, https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610609410635
DUTELLE, Aric W.; BECKER, Ronald F., Criminal investigation, Fifth (ed), Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Learning, 2019, available online at: https://books.google.ro/books?hl=en&lr=&id=hVBLDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=defense+in+forensic+criminal+cases&ots=NIzD7CmOPf&sig=xJK6wI2tBAhgtlAHPpdPZMK2L8U&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=defense%20in%20forensic%20criminal%20cases&f=false (accessed on 12 October 2019)
ENGEL, Christoph; GLÖCKNER, Andreas; TIMME, Sinika, Defendant Should Have the Last Word – Experimentally Manipulating Order and Provisional Assessment of the Facts in Criminal Procedure, Max Planck Institute Collective Goods Preprint, Bonn, vol. 24/2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3077855
FERRARA, Michela; SESSA, Francesco; RENDINE, Marcello; SPAGNOLO, Lorenzo; De Simone, Stefania; RIEZZO, Irene; RICCI, Pietrantonio; PASCALE, Natascha; SALERNO, Monica; BERTOZZI, Giuseppe; MAGLIETTA, Francesca, A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to solve complex crimes: a case report, Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 9/2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0116-8
GEHL, Rod; PLECAS, Darryl, Introduction to Criminal Investigation: Processes, Practices and Thinking. New Westminster, BC: Justice Institute of British Columbia, 2016, available online at: https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/criminalinvestigation/ (accessed on 25 October 2019)
GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE no. 75 of 2000 on the organization of the forensic examination, published in the Official Journal no. 407 of 29 August 2000.
JAIN, Anil K.; ROSS, Arun, Bridging the gap: from biometrics to forensics, Philos Trans R Soc B, vol. 370/2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0254
LAW NO. 156 of 5 July 2011 on modification and completing Government Ordinance no. 75/2000 on authorizing forensic experts and Law no. 567 of 2004 on the the status of the auxiliary employees of the courts of law and prosecutor offices attached with, published in the Official Journal no. 519 of 22 July 2011.
MAGHERESCU, Delia, Recunoasterea vinovatiei si aplicarea pedepsei, Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2019.
MAGHERESCU, Delia, The victims' rights on the forensic examination during the penal procedure in Romania. In: ANDRASKO, Jozef; HAMUĽAK, Juraj; KAHOUNOVA, Michaela (eds) Constitutional, Statutory and Criminological Attributes for Crime Victims, Bratislava: Univerzita Komenskeho v Bratislave, 2018, available online at: https://www.flaw.uniba.sk/fileadmin/praf/Veda/Konferencie_a_podujatia/bpf_2018_new/Zbornik_BPF2018_sekcia_1.pdf (accessed on 14 November 2019)
MAGHERESCU, Delia, Criminalistica, Bucharest: Wolters Kluwer Publishing House, 2017.
MATTHEWS, Jeanna; BABAEIANJELODAR, Marzieh; LORENZ, Stephen; MATTHEWS, Abigail; NJIE, Mariama; ADAMS, Nathaniel; KRANE, Dan; GOLDTHWAITE, Jessica; HUGHES, Clinton, The Right To Confront Your Accusers: Opening the Black Box of Forensic DNA Software. In: CONITZER, Vincent; HADFIELD, Gillian; VALLOR, Shannon (eds) Ethics, and Society, New York: ACM, 2019, doi 10.1145/3306618.3314279
MILLER, Marc L.; WRIGHT, Ron F.; TURNER, Jenia I.; LEVINE, Kay L., Criminal Procedures. Cases, Statutes, and Executive Materials, Sixth (ed), New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
MURPHY, Erin, Forensic evidence. In: LUNA, Erik (ed) Reforming Criminal Justice: Pretrial and Trial Processes, Phoenix: Arizona State University, 2017, available online at: https://law.asu.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academy_for_justice/Reforming-Criminal-Justice_Vol_3.pdf (accessed on 9 January 2020)
OBREJA, Efim; GURAU, Nicolae; POSTORONCA, Veronica; DERECHA, Larysa, Determinarea vechimii documentelor prin prisma practicii de expertiza judiciara, Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, Issue 2/2019.
ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony J.; LEECH, Nancy L., Generalization practices in qualitative research: A mixed methods case study, Quality & Quantity, vol. 44, Issue 5/2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z
PENAL DECISION no. 287/A of 28 February 2017 of the Court of Appeal of Timisoara, available online at: http://www.rolii.ro/hotarari/58d44a6ee49009481300003d (accessed on 8 September 2019)
PIEL, Jennifer, The Defense of Involuntary Intoxication by Prescribed Medications: An Appellate Case Review, The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, vol. 43, Issue 3/2015, available online at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1d9d/4123c20938e05acde6f2d06ea09106dfabe7.pdf (accessed on 26 October 2019)
QUEENSLAND SENTENCING ADVISORY COUNCIL, Community-based orders, imprisonment and parole options: Final report, Brisbane, 2019, available online at: www.sentencingcouncil.qld.gov.au (accessed on 12 September 2019)
SATALAN, Marian; LAPADUS, Vasile; BIRO, Lucian, Tendintele investigatiei criminalistice la nivel European. Expertul independent in practica judiciara, Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, Issue 1/2019.
SCHREIER, Margrit, Sampling and Generalization. In: FLICK, Uwe (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, London: SAGE Publications, 2018, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070
STANCU, Emilian, Tratat de criminalistica, Bucharest: Actami Publishing House, 2001.
STIFFELMAN, Bess, No longer the gold standard: Probabilistic Genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials, Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 24, Issue 1/2019.
SUIAN, Mihai, Unele probleme privind folosirea probelor digitale in procesul penal, Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, Issue 1/2019.
TIWARI, Neelesh; HARSHEY, Abhimaniu; DAS, Tanurup; ABHYANKAR, Sughosh; YADAV, Vijay Kumar; NIGAM, Kriti; ANAND, Vijay Raj; SRIVASTAVA, Ankit, Evidential significance of multiple fracture patterns on the glass in forensic ballistics, Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 9, Issue 22/2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0128-4
VOLONCIU, Nicolae, Tratat de procedura penala, Bucharest: Paideia, 1998.
WALTKE, Heather; LAPORTE, Gerald; WEISS, Danielle; SCHWARTING, Dawn; NGUYEN, Minh; SCOTT, Frances, Sexual Assault Cases: Exploring the Importance of Non-DNA Forensic Evidence. Investigating and prosecuting sexual assault crimes is much more complicated than simply performing DNA testing, NIJ Journal, Issue 279/2018, available online at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250704.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2019)
WALTON, Richard H., Practical Cold Case Homicide Investigations Procedural Manual, CRC Press, Boca Raton: Taykir and Francis Group, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1201/b16315
ZARAFIU, Andrei, Procedura penala. Partea generala. Partea speciala, 2nd ed, Bucharest: C.H. Beck, 2015.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
A partir de 2022, los artículos publicados en el RDPP tienen una licencia Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Los artículos publicados hasta 2021 adoptaron la licencia Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Cómo citar
