Using New Means of Technology during the Penal Proceedings in Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v5i3.250Parole chiave:
means of technology, digital evidence, procedural issues, respecting parties' rights, constitutional limitation.Abstract
The new legal framework created since 2014 while the new Code of penal procedure entered into force in Romania has opened a different way of approaching the justice in criminal matters. In such a legal context the judicial bodies are more accustomed with the idea of using the new means of technology in such a way not to infringe the parties' procedural rights during the penal trial knowing the fact that using illegal protocols signed by the prosecutor offices with the Romanian Intelligence Service was prohibited by the Constitutional Court of Romania. In the current paper, a qualitative research has been carried out on both legislative and jurisprudence items regarding the new means of technologies currently used in the penal justice. The main purpose of the paper is to analyze the effect of the new means of technology including the use of digital evidence which occur in the penal trial in Romania as well as to discuss the legal consequences they produce in practice. Some practical points of view have been highlighted taking into account the new means of technologies' efficiency. Moreover, in order to improve the penal procedure into force certain proposals of de lege ferenda have been provided.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
ALECU, Gheorghe; BARBANEAGRA, Alexei, Reglementarea penală și investigarea criminalistică a infractiunilor din domeniul informatic, Bucharest: Pinguin Book Publishing House, 2006.
BRITZ, Marjie T., Computer Forensics and Cyber Crime: An Introduction, New Jersey: Perason Education, 2013.
CAMPANA, Paolo, Understanding Then Responding to Italian Organized Crime Operations across Territories, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, Vol. 7, Issue 3/2013, pp. 316-325, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pat012
CONNERS, Kerry B., Warrants for Videotape Surveillance Issuable Despite Lack of Statutory Authority, St. John's Law Review: vol. 54, no. 4/1980, available online at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2418&context=lawreview (accessed on 18 May 2019)
CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA republished in the Official Journal of Romania, no. 669 of 22 September 2003, Bucharest: Themis Publishing House, 2003.
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS, Jurisprudence of admitting decisions, available online at: https://www.ccr.ro/jurisprudenta-decizii-de-admitere (accessed on 17 May 2019)
DUSEK, Libor, Time to punishment: The effects of a shorter criminal procedure on crime rates, International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 43/2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.04.007
GALETTA, Antonella The changing nature of the presumption of innocence in today's surveillance societies: rewrite human rights or regulate the use of surveillance technologies?, Belfast: European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2/2013, available online at: http://ejlt.org/article/view/221/377 (accessed on 14 May 2019)
GOUNEV, Philip; RUGGIERO, Vincenzo, Corruption and Organized Crime in Europe. Illegal Partnerships, London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2012.
INTRODUCTORY GUIDE of Applying Legal Regulations regarding the Digital Criminality, Bucharest: INTERNEWS RITI dot-GOV, 2004, available online at: http://www.riti-internews.ro/ro/ghid.htm (accessed on 17 May 2019).
JAIDEV, Ms., Brady Ruling, 1963 U.S. Supreme Court: Sifting from being heard to open trial American and Indian Context, International Journal of Research, vol. 05, Issue 01/2018, available online at: https://journals.eduindex.org/index.php/ijr/article/view/11807/11144 (accessed on 16 May 2019)
JURISPRUDENTA CEDO of Strasbourg, European Court of Human Rights, 2019. https://jurisprudentacedo.com/respectarea-vietii-private-si-familiale.html
LAW NO. 135/2010 on the Code of penal procedure of Romania, published in the Official Journal of Romania, no. 486 of 15 July 2010, entered into force on February 1, 2014.
MAGHERESCU, Delia, Recunoasterea vinovatiei si aplicarea pedepsei, Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2019.
MICLEA, Damian, Cunoasterea crimei organizate, Ploiesti: Pygmalion Publishing House, 2001.
OLTEANU, Gabriel Ion; RUIU, Marin, Tectica criminalistica, Bucharest: AIT Laboratories Publishing House, 2009.
REKHIS, Slim; BOUDRIGA, Noureddine, Visibility: A Novel Concept for Characterizing Provable Network Digital Evidences, International Journal of Security and Networks, No. 4/2009, available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220080823_Visibility_A_novel_concept_for_characterising_provable_network_digital_evidences (accessed on 21 May 2019)
SANCHEZ, Juan Carlos Ochoa, The Rights of Victims in Criminal Justice Proceedings for Serious Human Rights Violations, Brill/ Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.
SELEA, Mircea Mugurel, Application of the art. 102 (2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code in relation to special surveillance measures listed under the art. 138 (1) (a) and (c) of the Criminal Procedure Code enforced before the publication in the Official Journal, Revista de Stiinte Politice, Craiova: Universitaria Publishing House, Issue no. 53/2017, available online at: https://cis01.central.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul53_2017/10.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2019).
SUIAN, Mihai, Unele probleme privind folosirea probelor digitale in procesul penal. Bucharest: Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, No. 1/2019.
SUN, Jia-Rong; SHIH, Mao-Lin; HWANG, Min-Shiang, A Survey of Digital Evidences Forensic and Cybercrime Investigation Procedure, Taichung: International Journal of Network Security, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2015, available online at: http://ijns.jalaxy.com.tw/contents/ijns-v17-n5/ijns-2015-v17-n5-p497-509.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2019).
TRECHSEL, Stefan; SUMMERS, Sarah J., Human Rights in criminal Proceedings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
TULKENS, Francoise, The Paradoxical Relationship between Criminal Law and Human Rights, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 9, Issue 3/2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr028
UDROIU, Mihail; SLAVOIU, Radu; PREDESCU, Ovidiu, Tehnici speciale de investigare in justitia penala, Bucharest: C.H.Beck Publishing House, 2009.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
As of 2022, articles published in the RDPP are licensed under Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. rticles published until 2021 adopted the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Come citare
