Constitutionalisation of the right to a fair criminal trial as a process inspired by constitutional courts
Editorial of the dossier “The role of constitutional courts in shaping procedural fairness in criminal cases”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.703Keywords:
Constitutional courts, constitutionalisation of procedural fairness, fair trial rights in criminal casesAbstract
The 20th century is sometimes referred to as the century of constitutional courts. Constitutional justice was designed to ensure the protection of the constitution. Supporters of constitutional courts saw in it an opportunity to guarantee the supremacy of the constitution, to protect the individual against arbitrariness and omnipotence of the parliamentary majority. A key moment in this regard was the constitutionalisation of human rights and freedoms. Most of the fundamental rights, including procedural rights relevant to the criminal process, were incorporated into the constitution. This resulted in a rapid development of constitutional jurisprudence, especially in the matter of the right to a fair trial. Regardless of the scope of constitutional regulation, the right to a fair trial has become the most frequently invoked standard of review before the constitutional court. The constitutionalisation of guarantees of a fair criminal trial has become a fact. The article discusses what role constitutional courts play in this process and how they enrich the acquis constitutionnel with standards regarding fairness in criminal proceedings.Downloads
References
BARROSO, Luís Roberto; OSORIO, Aline. Democracy, Political Crisis, and Constitutional Jurisdiction. The Leading Role of the Brazilian Supreme Court. In: LANDFRIED, Christine (ed.). Judicial Power. How constitutional Court Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019
BORUCKA-ARCTOWA, Maria. Sprawiedliwość proceduralna a orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego i jego rola w okresie przemian systemu prawnego. In: TRZCIŃSKI, Janusz; JANKIEWICZ, Adam (eds.). Konstytucja i gwarancje jej przestrzegania. Warszawa: Biuro Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, 1996
BUMKE, Christina; VOßKUHLE, Andreas. German Constitutional Law. Introduction, Cases and Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019
CLAYTON, Richard; TOMLINSON, Hugh. Fair Trial Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010
CLIFF, Roberson. Constitutional Law and Criminal Justice. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 2016
DE VISSER, Maartje, Constitutional Review in Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2015
DEYVRE, Arthur. Filtered Constitutional Review and the Reconfiguration of International Judicial Relations. American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 61, no. 729 (2013)
DYEVRE, Arthur. The French Constitutional Council. In: JAKAB, András; DYEVRE, Arthur; ITZCOVICH, Giulo (eds.). Comparative Constitutional Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017
FRAISSE, Régis. L’article 16 de la Déclaration, clef de voûte des droits et libertés. Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel n° 44 (Le Conseil constitutionnel et le procès équitable), June 2014, https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/l-article-16-de-la-declaration-clef-de-voute-des-droits-et-libertes (accessed on: 24.03.2022)
FROSINI, Justin O.; PEGORARO, Lucio. Constitutional courts in Latin America: A Testing Grounds for New Parameters of Classification. Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 3, no. 2 (2008) pp. 39-63
GARLICKI, Lech. Judgments of the European court of human rights (their structure, impact and authority). In: ROCA, J. García; CUENCA, E. Carmona (eds.). ¿Hacia una globalizazión de los derechos? El impacto de las sentencias del Tribunal Europeo y de la Corte Interamericana. Navarra: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, 2017
GARLICKI, Lech. Sądownictwo konstytucyjne w Europie Zachodniej. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1987
GERALD, Daly Tom. The Alchemists. Questioning our Faith in Courts as Democracy-Builders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108283731
GINSBURG, Tom; ELKINS, Zachary. Ancillary Powers of Constitutional Courts. Texas Law Review, vol. 87, no. 1431 (2008), https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2439&context=journal_articles (accessed on: 13.03.2022), pp. 1432-1461
GONÇALO, Almeida Ribeiro. Judicial Review of Legislation in Portugal: A Brief Genealogy (2018). In: Constitutional History: Comparative Perspectives. Brill (2019 Forthcoming), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3271062
GOSS, Ryan. Criminal Fair Trial Rights. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2014
GREER, Steven; WILDHABER, Luzius. Revisiting the Debate about ‘constitutionalising’ the European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 12, no. 4, December 2012, pp. 655–687, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs034
GRIMM, Dieter, Types of Constitutions, In: ROSENFELD, M.; SAJÓ, A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford 2012. Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0006
Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention o Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (criminal limb), updated in 31 December 2021, https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf (accessed on: 25.03.2022)
HARRIS, David. The Right to a Fair Trial in Criminal Proceedings as a Human Right Author. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 2 (April 1967), pp. 352-378.
JACKSON, John D.; SUMMERS, Sarah J. (eds.) Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings. Individual Rights and Institutional Forms. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing 2018
KAY, Richard; FISCH, William B. The Constitutionalization of Law in the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 46 (1998), Faculty Articles and Papers, p. 512, https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers/512
KOKOTT, Juliane; KASPAR, Martin. Ensuring Constitutional Efficacy. In: The Oxford Handbooks Online, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0039
Le Conseil constitutionnel et les droits de la défense, speech by M. Jean-Louis DEBRÉ – Rentrée du Barreau de Paris, Théatre du Chatelet, 4 December 2009, https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/les-membres/le-conseil-constitutionnel-et-les-droits-de-la-defense#_ftn1 (accessed on: 24.03.2022)
LIND, E. Allan; TYLER, Tom R. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenym, 1988
MASON, Alpheus T. Myth and Reality in Supreme Court Decisions. Virginia Law Review, vol. 48, no. 8, 1962, pp. 1385–406, https://doi.org/10.2307/1071211
MENDES HÜBNER, Conrado. The Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil, [in:] JAKAB, András; DYEVRE, Arthur; ITZCOVICH, Giulo (eds.). Comparative Constitutional Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017
MICHAELSEN, Christopher. ‘From Strasbourg, with Love’- Preventive Detention before the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights, ‘From Strasbourg, with Love’- Preventive Detention before the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 12:1(2012), pp.148-167
PUCHTA Radosław, Problem standardów organizacyjnych i proceduralnych w zakresie sprawowania wymiaru sprawiedliwości w orzecznictwie francuskiej Rady Konstytucyjnej. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, no. 3, 2016, pp. 245-274
SADURSKI, Wojciech. Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 22, no. 2 (2002), pp. 275–299
SADURSKI, Wojciech. Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments. Human Rights Law Review, vol. 9, no. 3, 2009, pp. 397–453, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp011
SUMMERS, Sarah. Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing 2007.
SWEET, Alec Stone. Constitutional Courts. In: ROSENFELD, M.; SAJÓ, A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford 2012. Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0040
SWEET, Alec Stone. Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review: And Why It May Not Matter. Michigan Law Review vol. 101, no. 8 (2003), pp. 2744–80, https://doi.org/10.2307/3595394. p. 2772
THIBAUT, John; WALKER, Laurens. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975
TRECHSEL, Stefan, Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
VEDEL, Georges. Le gouvernement des juges commence quand ceux-ci ne se contentent pas d 'appliquer ou d 'interpréter des textes, mais imposent des normes qui sont en réalité des produits de leur propre esprit, Neuf ans au Conseil constitutionnel, Extract from 'Le débat' n° 55 (March-August 1989), https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/les-membres/neuf-ans-au-conseil-constitutionnel (accessed on: 25.03.2022)
VIDMAR, Neil. The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness, Law and Social Inquiry 1991, pp. 877-892
VOGER, Richard. Due Process. In: ROSENFELD Michel, SAJÓ András (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford 2012. Online Publication https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0046
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marta Kłopocka-Jasińska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As of 2022, articles published in the RDPP are licensed under Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. rticles published until 2021 adopted the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
How to Cite
