Using New Means of Technology during the Penal Proceedings in Romania

Delia Magherescu

doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v5i3.250

Autores/as

Delia Magherescu Gorj Bar Association, Romania http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-1549

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v5i3.250

Palabras clave:

medios tecnológicos, prueba digital, cuestiones procesales, garantía de los derechos de las partes, límites constitucionales.

Resumen

El nuevo marco jurídico creado en Rumanía en 2014, con la aprobación de un nuevo Código de procedimiento penal, ha transformado la forma de aproximación a la justicia penal. En este contexto jurídico, los entes jurisdiccionales se han ido adaptando a usar nuevos medios tecnológicos en el marco de los procedimientos penales sin infringir los derechos procesales de las partes, tras la prohibición, por parte del Tribunal Constitucional, del empleo de protocolos ilegales firmados por las fiscalías con el Servicio de Inteligencia de Rumanía. En este trabajo se desarrolla una investigación cualitativa, que analiza materiales legislativos y jurisprudenciales, sobre los nuevos medios tecnológicos que se usan en la justicia penal. El objetivo principal del artículo es analizar los efectos de esos nuevos medios tecnológicos empleados en el procedimiento, incluidas las pruebas digitales, así como discutir las consecuencias jurídicas que producen en la práctica. En este sentido, se ponen de relieve algunos puntos de vista prácticos que destacan la eficiencia de los nuevos medios tecnológicos. Junto a ello, se hacen algunas propuestas de lege ferenda para mejorar el procedimiento penal en vigor.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Delia Magherescu, Gorj Bar Association, Romania

Doctor in Law, State University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova, since 2005

Referencias

ALECU, Gheorghe; BARBANEAGRA, Alexei, Reglementarea penală și investigarea criminalistică a infractiunilor din domeniul informatic, Bucharest: Pinguin Book Publishing House, 2006.

BRITZ, Marjie T., Computer Forensics and Cyber Crime: An Introduction, New Jersey: Perason Education, 2013.

CAMPANA, Paolo, Understanding Then Responding to Italian Organized Crime Operations across Territories, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, Vol. 7, Issue 3/2013, pp. 316-325, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pat012

CONNERS, Kerry B., Warrants for Videotape Surveillance Issuable Despite Lack of Statutory Authority, St. John's Law Review: vol. 54, no. 4/1980, available online at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2418&context=lawreview (accessed on 18 May 2019)

CONSTITUTION OF ROMANIA republished in the Official Journal of Romania, no. 669 of 22 September 2003, Bucharest: Themis Publishing House, 2003.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS, Jurisprudence of admitting decisions, available online at: https://www.ccr.ro/jurisprudenta-decizii-de-admitere (accessed on 17 May 2019)

DUSEK, Libor, Time to punishment: The effects of a shorter criminal procedure on crime rates, International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 43/2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.04.007

GALETTA, Antonella The changing nature of the presumption of innocence in today's surveillance societies: rewrite human rights or regulate the use of surveillance technologies?, Belfast: European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2/2013, available online at: http://ejlt.org/article/view/221/377 (accessed on 14 May 2019)

GOUNEV, Philip; RUGGIERO, Vincenzo, Corruption and Organized Crime in Europe. Illegal Partnerships, London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2012.

INTRODUCTORY GUIDE of Applying Legal Regulations regarding the Digital Criminality, Bucharest: INTERNEWS RITI dot-GOV, 2004, available online at: http://www.riti-internews.ro/ro/ghid.htm (accessed on 17 May 2019).

JAIDEV, Ms., Brady Ruling, 1963 U.S. Supreme Court: Sifting from being heard to open trial American and Indian Context, International Journal of Research, vol. 05, Issue 01/2018, available online at: https://journals.eduindex.org/index.php/ijr/article/view/11807/11144 (accessed on 16 May 2019)

JURISPRUDENTA CEDO of Strasbourg, European Court of Human Rights, 2019. https://jurisprudentacedo.com/respectarea-vietii-private-si-familiale.html

LAW NO. 135/2010 on the Code of penal procedure of Romania, published in the Official Journal of Romania, no. 486 of 15 July 2010, entered into force on February 1, 2014.

MAGHERESCU, Delia, Recunoasterea vinovatiei si aplicarea pedepsei, Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2019.

MICLEA, Damian, Cunoasterea crimei organizate, Ploiesti: Pygmalion Publishing House, 2001.

OLTEANU, Gabriel Ion; RUIU, Marin, Tectica criminalistica, Bucharest: AIT Laboratories Publishing House, 2009.

REKHIS, Slim; BOUDRIGA, Noureddine, Visibility: A Novel Concept for Characterizing Provable Network Digital Evidences, International Journal of Security and Networks, No. 4/2009, available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220080823_Visibility_A_novel_concept_for_characterising_provable_network_digital_evidences (accessed on 21 May 2019)

SANCHEZ, Juan Carlos Ochoa, The Rights of Victims in Criminal Justice Proceedings for Serious Human Rights Violations, Brill/ Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.

SELEA, Mircea Mugurel, Application of the art. 102 (2) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code in relation to special surveillance measures listed under the art. 138 (1) (a) and (c) of the Criminal Procedure Code enforced before the publication in the Official Journal, Revista de Stiinte Politice, Craiova: Universitaria Publishing House, Issue no. 53/2017, available online at: https://cis01.central.ucv.ro/revistadestiintepolitice/files/numarul53_2017/10.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2019).

SUIAN, Mihai, Unele probleme privind folosirea probelor digitale in procesul penal. Bucharest: Doctrina si Jurisprudenta, No. 1/2019.

SUN, Jia-Rong; SHIH, Mao-Lin; HWANG, Min-Shiang, A Survey of Digital Evidences Forensic and Cybercrime Investigation Procedure, Taichung: International Journal of Network Security, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2015, available online at: http://ijns.jalaxy.com.tw/contents/ijns-v17-n5/ijns-2015-v17-n5-p497-509.pdf (accessed on 21 May 2019).

TRECHSEL, Stefan; SUMMERS, Sarah J., Human Rights in criminal Proceedings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

TULKENS, Francoise, The Paradoxical Relationship between Criminal Law and Human Rights, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 9, Issue 3/2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr028

UDROIU, Mihail; SLAVOIU, Radu; PREDESCU, Ovidiu, Tehnici speciale de investigare in justitia penala, Bucharest: C.H.Beck Publishing House, 2009.