Oitivas e interrogatórios baseados em evidências:
considerações sobre entrevista investigativa aplicado na investigação criminal.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.665Palavras-chave:
Entrevista, Memória, Treinamento, PolicialResumo
Policiais realizam entrevistas com vítimas, testemunhas, e suspeitos para obter informações, sendo a acurácia e a quantidade destas informações diretamente relacionadas às técnicas de entrevista utilizadas. Uma entrevista com técnicas inadequadas tende a gerar poucas informações e potencialmente imprecisas, prejudicando o processo investigativo e o sistema de justiça. Já uma entrevista com técnicas adequadas é capaz de resultar em um maior número de informações confiáveis, preservando os direitos dos entrevistados. Neste artigo de revisão narrativa são apresentadas técnicas de entrevista investigativa e sua importância para a obtenção de informações confiáveis em oitivas e interrogatórios. Em seguida, apresenta-se um exemplo de como a entrevista investigativa foi implementada no Reino Unido, demonstrando como a aproximação entre pesquisadores e policiais pode auxiliar no processo de implementação e avaliação de treinamento.
Downloads
Referências
ABBE, Allison; BRANDON, Susan. The Role of Rapport in Investigative Interviewing: A Review. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Nova Jersey, v. 10, n. 3, p. 237–249, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1386
ALISON, Laurence John. et al. Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, Washington, v. 19, n. 4, p. 411–431, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034564
BALLARDIN, Maria da Graça; MILNITSKY, Lilian Stein; MILNE, Rebecca. Além das técnicas de entrevista: características individuais em entrevista investigativa com testemunhas. Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública, São Paulo, v. 7, n. 2, p. 6–16, 2013.
CECI, Stephen J; BRUCK, Maggie. Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1995.
CLARKE, Colin; MILNE, Rebecca Jane. Interviewing suspects in England and Wales. In: WALSH, David. et al. International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: suspects. Londres: Routledge, 2017. p. 133–150.
CLARKE, Colin; MILNE, Rebecca. National evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. Londres: Home office London, abril de 2001. Disponivel em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263127370_National_Evaluation_of_the_PEACE_Investigative_Interviewing_Course>. Acesso em: 9 de agosto de 2021.
CLARKE, Colin; MILNE, Rebecca; BULL, Ray. Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Nova Jersey, v. 8, n. 2, p. 149–162, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.144
FAHSING, Ivar A. The Making of an Expert Detective. Thinking and Deciding in Criminal Investigations. Gotemburgo: University of Gothenburg, 2016.
FAHSING, Ivar A; RACHLEW, Asbjørn. Investigative interviewing in the Nordic region. In: WILLIAMSON, Tom; MILNE, Becky; SAVAGE, Stephen P. International developments in investigative interviewing. Londres: Routledge, 2009. p. 39–65.
FISHER, Ronald P; GEISELMAN, R Edward. Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1992.
GRIFFITHS, Andrew; WALSH, David. Qualitative analysis of qualitative evaluation: an exploratory examination of investigative interviewers’ reflections on their performance. Psychology, Crime and Law, Londres, v. 24, n. 4, p. 433–450, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390115
GRIFFITHS, Andy; MILNE, Rebecca. The psychology of criminal investigation: From theory to practice. Londres: Routledge, 2018.
GRIFFITHS, Andy; MILNE, Rebecca. Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In:WILLIAMSON, Tom. Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation. Londres: Willan Publishing, 2006. p. 167-189.
HILL, Jade A; MOSTON, Stephen. Police perceptions of investigative interviewing: Training needs and operational practices in Australia. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Londres, v. 13, n. 2, p. 72–83, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641111134314
KASSIN, Saul M. et al. Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, Washington, v. 34, n. 1, p. 49-52, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
KIECKHAEFER, Jenna Mitchell; VALLANO, Jonathan P; COMPO, Nadja Schreiber. Examining the positive effects of rapport building: When and why does rapport building benefit adult eyewitness memory? Memory, Maryland, v. 22, n. 8, p. 1010–1023, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.864313
LAMB, Michael E. et al. A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, Amsterdã, v. 31, n. 11, p. 1201–1231, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
LAMB, Michael E. Difficulties translating research on forensic interview practices to practitioners: Finding water, leading horses, but can we get them to drink? The American Psychologist, Washington, v. 71, n. 8, p. 710–718, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000039
LASSITER, G Daniel. et al. Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. The Journal of applied psychology, Washington, v. 87, n. 5, p. 867-74, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.867
LIDEN, Moa; GRANS, Minna; JUSLIN, Peter. The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques. Law and human behavior, Washington, v. 42, n. 4, p. 336–354, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000287
LOFTUS, Elizabeth F. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, Washington, v. 12, n. 4, p. 361–366, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
MACDONALD, Sarah; SNOOK, Brent; MILNE, Rebecca. Witness Interview Training: a Field Evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, Berlim, v. 32, n. 1, p. 77–84, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9197-6
MEISSNER, Christian A. et al. Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, Berlim, v. 10, n. 4, p. 459–486, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
MEISSNER, Christian A; KELLY, Christopher E; WOESTEHOFF, Skye A. Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Palo Alto, v. 11, n. 1, p. 211–233, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657
MEMON, Amina. et al. Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Nova Jersey, v. 8, n. 7, p. 641–659, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080704
MILNE, Rebecca; BULL, Ray. Interviewing Victims of Crime, Including Children and People with Intellectual Disabilities. Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions, Nova Jersey, p. 7–23, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713389.ch1
MILNE, Rebecca; SHAW, Gary; BULL, Ray. Investigative interviewing: The role of research. Applying psychology to criminal justice, Nova Jersey, p. 65–80, 2007. 10.1002/9780470713068.ch4
MILNE, Becky; BULL, Ray. Interviewing by the police. In: CARSON, David; BULL, Ray. Handbook of psychology in legal contexts, Nova Jersey: Wiley, 2003, p. 109-125.
MOSCATELLI, Lívia Yuen Ngan. Considerações sobre a confissão e o método Reid aplicado na investigação criminal. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, Porto Alegre, v. 6, n. 1, p. 361-394, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.331
MYKLEBUST, Trond; BJØRKLUND, Roald A. The effect of long-term training on police officers’ use of open and closed questions in field investigative interviews of children (FIIC). Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Nova Jersey, v. 3, n. 3, p. 165–181, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.52
OXBURGH, Gavin E; MYKLEBUST, Trond; GRANT, Tim. The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, Sheffield, v. 17, n. 1, p. 45–66, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
PACHECO, Ana, P. L; HOFFMANN, M. E. Entrevista investigativa e avaliação psicológica: algumas Contribuições para as práticas policiais de elucidação de crimes. Ciências Policiais em revista.v.1, N. 1, p. 115-125.
PAULO, Rui M; ALBUQUERQUE, Pedro B; BULL, Ray. A Entrevista Cognitiva Melhorada: Pressupostos teóricos, investigação e aplicação. PSICOLOGIA, Lisboa, v. 28, n. 2, p. 21–30, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v28i2.639
POOLE, Debra Ann; BRUCK, Maggie; PIPE, Margaret-Ellen. Forensic Interviewing Aids: Do Props Help Children Answer Questions About Touching? Current Directions in Psychological Science, Indiana, v. 20, n. 1, p. 11–15, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388804
POWELL, Martine B; FISHER, Ronald P; WRIGHT, Rebecca. Investigative interviewing. Psychology and law: An empirical perspective, Washington, p. 11–42, 2005.
READ, Julianne M. et al. Investigative interviewing of suspected sex offenders: a review of what constitutes best practice. International Journal of Police Science and Management, Nova York, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1–18, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2009.00.0.143
ROEBERS, Claudia M; SCHNEIDER, Wolfgang. The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults. Applied cognitive psychology, Nova Jersey, v. 14, n. 6, p. 509–526, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<509::AID-ACP668>3.0.CO;2-W
STEIN, L. M; ÁVILA, Gustavo Noronha. Avanços científicos em Psicologia do Testemunho aplicados ao reconhecimento pessoal e aos depoimentos forenses. Brasília: Secretaria de Assuntos Legislativos, Ministério da Justiça (Série Pensando Direito, No. 59)., 2015. E-book.
ST-YVES, Michel. et al. Training in Investigative Interviewing. In: ST- YVES, Michel. Investigative Interviewing-The Essentials. Montreal: Éditions Yvon Blais, 2014. p. 245–282.
VALLANO, Jonathan P; COMPO, Nadja Schreiber. Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, Washington, v. 21, n. 1, p. 85-99, 2015. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000035
VESSEL, David. Conducting successful interrogations. FBI Law. Enforcement Bulletin, Washington, v. 67, p. 1-6, 1998. 10.1037/e313092004-001
WALSH, Dave; BULL, Ray. Examining Rapport in Investigative Interviews with Suspects: Does its Building and Maintenance Work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, Berlim, v. 27, n. 1, p. 73–84, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x
WALSH, Dave; BULL, Ray. Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime and Law, Londres, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1-20, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544
WALSH, Dave; BULL, Ray. What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, Nova Jersey, v. 15, n. 2, p. 305–321, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463356
WALSH, Dave; KING, Mick; GRIFFITHS, Andy. Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: but are investigators’ self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime and Law, Londres, v. 23, n. 7, p. 1-33, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1296149
WESTERA, Nina J; KEBBELL, Mark R; MILNE, Becky. Interviewing witnesses: Do investigative and evidential requirements concur? British Journal of Forensic Practice, Londres, v. 13, n. 2, p. 103–113, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641111134341
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 William Weber Cecconello, Rebecca Milne, Lilian Milnitsky Stein
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação, impressa e/ou digital.
Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de auto-plágio.
- Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação, além do link DOI para referência cruzada. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Por se tratar de periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais e científicas desde que citada a fonte, conforme a licença da Creative Commons.
A partir de 2022, os artigos publicados na RDPP estão licenciados com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Os artigos puliicados até 2021 adotaram a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
---------------
Arquivamento e distribuição
Permite-se sem restrições o arquivamento do PDF final publicado, em qualquer servidor de acesso aberto, indexador, repositório ou site pessoal, como Academia.edu e ResearchGate.
Como Citar
