Oitivas e interrogatórios baseados em evidências: : considerações sobre entrevista investigativa aplicado na investigação criminal.

William Weber Cecconello; Rebecca Milne; Lilian Milnitsky Stein

doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.665

Authors

William Weber Cecconello Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-2076
Rebecca Milne http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-8495
Lilian Milnitsky Stein http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2314-7369

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.665

Keywords:

Interview, Memory, Training, Police

Abstract

Police officers interview victims, witnesses and suspects to obtain information, and the quality and quantity of this information are directly related to the techniques used. An interview with inappropriate techniques tends to generate little accurate information, impairing the investigative process and the justice system. An interview with appropriate techniques, however, can result in more reliable information, preserving the rights of interviewees. In this paper we present investigative interview techniques and their importance for obtaining reliable information from witnesses, victims, and suspects. Then, we present the example of how this change was made in the United Kingdom, demonstrating how the dialogue between researchers and law enforcement can assist in the process of training implementation and evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

William Weber Cecconello, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Doutor em Psicologia Cognitiva pela PUCRS (2021). Psicólogo Jurídico e Professor de Psicologia na IMED (Campus Passo Fundo). Graduado em Psicologia pela IMED (2015), Mestre em Psicologia pela PUCRS (2017). Experiência em Psicologia Jurídica e Forense, com foco em pareceres técnicos e Treinamentos voltados à Psicologia do Testemunho. Tem desenvolvido pesquisas na área de falsas memórias, reconhecimento, e técnicas de entrevista, com o objetivo de compreender melhor os processos cognitivos de vítimas, testemunhas, e suspeitos, e testar procedimentos que melhorem práticas investigativas.
Rebecca Milne

635 / 5.000 Resultados de traduçãoBecky Milne é professora de psicologia forense, psicóloga e cientista forense licenciada e membro associado da British Psychological Society. Ela é editora associada do International Journal of Police Science and Management e faz parte do conselho editorial do Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Frontiers: Forensic and Legal Psychology, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology e do British Journal of Forensic Prática. Becky é um dos membros líderes acadêmicos do Grupo de orientação estratégica para entrevistas investigativas do Conselho Nacional de Chefes de Polícia (NPCC).

References

ABBE, Allison; BRANDON, Susan. The Role of Rapport in Investigative Interviewing: A Review. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Nova Jersey, v. 10, n. 3, p. 237–249, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1386

ALISON, Laurence John. et al. Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, Washington, v. 19, n. 4, p. 411–431, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034564

BALLARDIN, Maria da Graça; MILNITSKY, Lilian Stein; MILNE, Rebecca. Além das técnicas de entrevista: características individuais em entrevista investigativa com testemunhas. Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública, São Paulo, v. 7, n. 2, p. 6–16, 2013.

CECI, Stephen J; BRUCK, Maggie. Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1995.

CLARKE, Colin; MILNE, Rebecca Jane. Interviewing suspects in England and Wales. In: WALSH, David. et al. International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: suspects. Londres: Routledge, 2017. p. 133–150.

CLARKE, Colin; MILNE, Rebecca. National evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. Londres: Home office London, abril de 2001. Disponivel em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263127370_National_Evaluation_of_the_PEACE_Investigative_Interviewing_Course>. Acesso em: 9 de agosto de 2021.

CLARKE, Colin; MILNE, Rebecca; BULL, Ray. Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Nova Jersey, v. 8, n. 2, p. 149–162, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.144

FAHSING, Ivar A. The Making of an Expert Detective. Thinking and Deciding in Criminal Investigations. Gotemburgo: University of Gothenburg, 2016.

FAHSING, Ivar A; RACHLEW, Asbjørn. Investigative interviewing in the Nordic region. In: WILLIAMSON, Tom; MILNE, Becky; SAVAGE, Stephen P. International developments in investigative interviewing. Londres: Routledge, 2009. p. 39–65.

FISHER, Ronald P; GEISELMAN, R Edward. Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1992.

GRIFFITHS, Andrew; WALSH, David. Qualitative analysis of qualitative evaluation: an exploratory examination of investigative interviewers’ reflections on their performance. Psychology, Crime and Law, Londres, v. 24, n. 4, p. 433–450, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390115

GRIFFITHS, Andy; MILNE, Rebecca. The psychology of criminal investigation: From theory to practice. Londres: Routledge, 2018.

GRIFFITHS, Andy; MILNE, Rebecca. Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In:WILLIAMSON, Tom. Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation. Londres: Willan Publishing, 2006. p. 167-189.

HILL, Jade A; MOSTON, Stephen. Police perceptions of investigative interviewing: Training needs and operational practices in Australia. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Londres, v. 13, n. 2, p. 72–83, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641111134314

KASSIN, Saul M. et al. Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, Washington, v. 34, n. 1, p. 49-52, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6

KIECKHAEFER, Jenna Mitchell; VALLANO, Jonathan P; COMPO, Nadja Schreiber. Examining the positive effects of rapport building: When and why does rapport building benefit adult eyewitness memory? Memory, Maryland, v. 22, n. 8, p. 1010–1023, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.864313

LAMB, Michael E. et al. A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, Amsterdã, v. 31, n. 11, p. 1201–1231, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021

LAMB, Michael E. Difficulties translating research on forensic interview practices to practitioners: Finding water, leading horses, but can we get them to drink? The American Psychologist, Washington, v. 71, n. 8, p. 710–718, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000039

LASSITER, G Daniel. et al. Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. The Journal of applied psychology, Washington, v. 87, n. 5, p. 867-74, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.867

LIDEN, Moa; GRANS, Minna; JUSLIN, Peter. The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques. Law and human behavior, Washington, v. 42, n. 4, p. 336–354, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000287

LOFTUS, Elizabeth F. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, Washington, v. 12, n. 4, p. 361–366, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705

MACDONALD, Sarah; SNOOK, Brent; MILNE, Rebecca. Witness Interview Training: a Field Evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, Berlim, v. 32, n. 1, p. 77–84, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9197-6

MEISSNER, Christian A. et al. Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, Berlim, v. 10, n. 4, p. 459–486, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6

MEISSNER, Christian A; KELLY, Christopher E; WOESTEHOFF, Skye A. Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Palo Alto, v. 11, n. 1, p. 211–233, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657

MEMON, Amina. et al. Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Nova Jersey, v. 8, n. 7, p. 641–659, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080704

MILNE, Rebecca; BULL, Ray. Interviewing Victims of Crime, Including Children and People with Intellectual Disabilities. Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions, Nova Jersey, p. 7–23, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713389.ch1

MILNE, Rebecca; SHAW, Gary; BULL, Ray. Investigative interviewing: The role of research. Applying psychology to criminal justice, Nova Jersey, p. 65–80, 2007. 10.1002/9780470713068.ch4

MILNE, Becky; BULL, Ray. Interviewing by the police. In: CARSON, David; BULL, Ray. Handbook of psychology in legal contexts, Nova Jersey: Wiley, 2003, p. 109-125.

MOSCATELLI, Lívia Yuen Ngan. Considerações sobre a confissão e o método Reid aplicado na investigação criminal. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, Porto Alegre, v. 6, n. 1, p. 361-394, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.331

MYKLEBUST, Trond; BJØRKLUND, Roald A. The effect of long-term training on police officers’ use of open and closed questions in field investigative interviews of children (FIIC). Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Nova Jersey, v. 3, n. 3, p. 165–181, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.52

OXBURGH, Gavin E; MYKLEBUST, Trond; GRANT, Tim. The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, Sheffield, v. 17, n. 1, p. 45–66, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45

PACHECO, Ana, P. L; HOFFMANN, M. E. Entrevista investigativa e avaliação psicológica: algumas Contribuições para as práticas policiais de elucidação de crimes. Ciências Policiais em revista.v.1, N. 1, p. 115-125.

PAULO, Rui M; ALBUQUERQUE, Pedro B; BULL, Ray. A Entrevista Cognitiva Melhorada: Pressupostos teóricos, investigação e aplicação. PSICOLOGIA, Lisboa, v. 28, n. 2, p. 21–30, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v28i2.639

POOLE, Debra Ann; BRUCK, Maggie; PIPE, Margaret-Ellen. Forensic Interviewing Aids: Do Props Help Children Answer Questions About Touching? Current Directions in Psychological Science, Indiana, v. 20, n. 1, p. 11–15, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388804

POWELL, Martine B; FISHER, Ronald P; WRIGHT, Rebecca. Investigative interviewing. Psychology and law: An empirical perspective, Washington, p. 11–42, 2005.

READ, Julianne M. et al. Investigative interviewing of suspected sex offenders: a review of what constitutes best practice. International Journal of Police Science and Management, Nova York, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1–18, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2009.00.0.143

ROEBERS, Claudia M; SCHNEIDER, Wolfgang. The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults. Applied cognitive psychology, Nova Jersey, v. 14, n. 6, p. 509–526, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<509::AID-ACP668>3.0.CO;2-W

STEIN, L. M; ÁVILA, Gustavo Noronha. Avanços científicos em Psicologia do Testemunho aplicados ao reconhecimento pessoal e aos depoimentos forenses. Brasília: Secretaria de Assuntos Legislativos, Ministério da Justiça (Série Pensando Direito, No. 59)., 2015. E-book.

ST-YVES, Michel. et al. Training in Investigative Interviewing. In: ST- YVES, Michel. Investigative Interviewing-The Essentials. Montreal: Éditions Yvon Blais, 2014. p. 245–282.

VALLANO, Jonathan P; COMPO, Nadja Schreiber. Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, Washington, v. 21, n. 1, p. 85-99, 2015. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000035

VESSEL, David. Conducting successful interrogations. FBI Law. Enforcement Bulletin, Washington, v. 67, p. 1-6, 1998. 10.1037/e313092004-001

WALSH, Dave; BULL, Ray. Examining Rapport in Investigative Interviews with Suspects: Does its Building and Maintenance Work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, Berlim, v. 27, n. 1, p. 73–84, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x

WALSH, Dave; BULL, Ray. Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime and Law, Londres, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1-20, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544

WALSH, Dave; BULL, Ray. What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, Nova Jersey, v. 15, n. 2, p. 305–321, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463356

WALSH, Dave; KING, Mick; GRIFFITHS, Andy. Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: but are investigators’ self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime and Law, Londres, v. 23, n. 7, p. 1-33, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1296149

WESTERA, Nina J; KEBBELL, Mark R; MILNE, Becky. Interviewing witnesses: Do investigative and evidential requirements concur? British Journal of Forensic Practice, Londres, v. 13, n. 2, p. 103–113, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641111134341