The impact of the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal on the standard of detention on remand in Poland

Andrzej Sakowicz

doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.682

Autores

Andrzej Sakowicz University of Bialystok Faculty of Law, Mickiewicza 1 15-213 Białystok, Poland http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-4876

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.682

Palavras-chave:

prisão cautelar, Tribunal Constitucional, processo penal, acesso à defesa técnica, acesso aos autos da investigação, Polônia

Resumo

access to the file of pre-trial proceedings; Poland.

Resumo: Prisão cautelar é intrinsicamente relacionada aos direitos e liberdades individuais do indivíduo e, em particular, com a liberdade pessoal, o direito ao devido processo e o princípio da presunção de inocência. Este artigo explora a dimensão constitucional da aplicação da prisão cautelar na Polônia. Sua primeira parte destaca os valores constitucionais que são violadas em consequência da prisão cautelar. O status do princípio da proporcionalidade é ressaltado, tanto no direito constitucional como no direito processual penal. Posteriormente, o artigo apresente o papel do Tribunal Constitucional da Polônia e analisa a sua jurisprudência sobre prisão cautelar, que enfatiza a diretiva para minimizar a duração e o princípio da proporcionalidade das medidas cautelares, o qual determina que a prisão cautelar pode ser utilizada como como ultima ratio. Em particular, a pesquisa analisa decisões que tratam do acesso aos autos da investigação na parte relacionada à prisão cautelar, do acesso da pessoa detida ao advogado, da duração da prisão cautelar e do contato do preso com seus familiares.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

Andrzej Sakowicz, University of Bialystok Faculty of Law, Mickiewicza 1 15-213 Białystok, Poland

Department of Criminal Procedure
Faculty of Law,
Mickiewicza 1
15-213 Białystok
Poland

Referências

BAKER, Estella; HARKIN, Tricia; MITSILEGAS, Valsamis; PERŠAK, Nina. The Need for and Possible Content of EU Pre-trial Detention Rules, Eucrim, 3, pp. 221-229, 2020, https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-020

HERMELIŃSKI, Wojciech; NITA-ŚWIATŁOWSKA, Barbara. Tymczasowe aresztowanie ze względu na grożącą oskarżonemu surową karę (Provisional detention due to the potential severity of penalty). Palestra. n. 6, pp. 14-24. 2018.

HERLIN-KARNELL, Ester. The Power of Comparative Constitutional Law Reasoning in European Criminal Law Procedure. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 2019, vol. 13, p. 1-27, https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2018-0047

JAMRÓZ, Lech. The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland in the Context of Constitutional Judiciary. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Temida 2, 2014.

JASIŃSKI, Wojciech; KREMENS, Karolina. Poland. International Encyclopedia of Laws: Criminal Law. The Netherlands. Kluwer Law International, 2019.

KARDAS, Piotr; WILIŃSKI, Paweł: O niekonstytucyjności odmowy dostępu do akt sprawy w postępowaniu w przedmiocie tymczasowego aresztowania (Concerning the Unconstitutionality of the Refusing to Inspect Files in the Proceeding in Order to Issue a Preliminary Detention). Palestra. n. 7-8, pp. 23-35, 2008.

KLEPCZYŃSKI, Adam; KŁADOCZNY, Piotr; WIŚNIEWSKA, Katarzyna. The Trials of Pre-trial Detention. Report. A review of the existing practice of application of pre-trial detention in Poland. Warsaw: The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, 2019, pp. 7-32

MANCANO, Leandro. The Use of the Charter and Pre-trial Detention in EU Law: Constraints and Possibilities for Better Protection of the Right to Liberty. European Papers. vol. 6. n. 1, pp. 125-139, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/457

MARTUFI, Adriano; PERISTERIDOU Christina. The Purposes of Pre-Trial Detention and the Quest for Alternatives, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 28, n. 2, p. 155, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10002

MCSHERRY, Bernadette. Pretrial and Civil Detention of “Dangerous” Individuals in Common Law Jurisdictions. In: BROWN, Darryl K.; TURNER, Jenia I.; WEISSER, Bettina. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. pp. 522-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.29

MERKEL, Grischa. Detention before Trial and Civil Detention of Dangerous Individuals. In BROWN, Darryl K.; TURNER, Jenia Iontcheva; WEISSER, Bettina. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. p. 508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.28

MORGENSTERN, Christine; Chapter 21 Poland. In: VAN KALMTHOUT, Anton; KNAPEN, Marije; MORGENSTERN, Christine (eds.). Pre-trial Detention in the European Union An Analysis of Minimum Standards in Pre-trial Detention and the grounds for Regular Review in the Member States of the EU. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2009, pp. 717-752.

MORGENSTERN, Christine; KROMREY, Hans. Towards Pre-trial Detention as Ultima Ratio. Available at: https://www.irks.at/detour/DE%201st%20National%20report%20031116.pdf. Accessed on March 12, 2022.

PILITOWSKI, Bartosz. Current practice of applying pre-trial detention in Poland. Report from empirical research, Court Watch Poland Foundation. Available at: https://courtwatch.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/fcwp_PTD_en.pdf Access on: March 13, 2022;

PILITOWSKI, Bartosz. A Measure of Last Resort? The practice of pre-trial detention decision making in the EU. Available at: <https://fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2022/01/A-Measure-of-Last-Resort-Full-Version.pdf>, pp. 67-71. Access on: March 13, 2022

RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

SAKOWICZ, Andrzej. Suspect’s access to a lawyer at an early stage of criminal proceedings in the view the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, vol. 7, n. 3, p. 1979-2009, set./dez. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.565

SKORUPKA, Jerzy. Standard dostępu do informacji o podstawie Dowodowej tymczasowego aresztowania W prawie unii europejskiej i prawie polskim (Standard of Access to Information about the Evidential Base of Provisional Detention in European Union and Polish Law). Przegląd Prawea i Administracji, v. CXX, n. 2, p. 241-253, 2020. https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.120.66

ŚLEDZIŃSKA-SIMON, Anna. Proportionality Analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In KREMNITZER Mordechai; STEINER Talya; LANG Andrej (dds.). Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 385-457, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596268.008

WALTOŚ, Stanisław; HOFMAŃSKI, Piotr. Proces karny [Criminal process], Warszawa: WoltersKluwer, 2020.

WĄSEK-WIADEREK, Małgorzata. Zasada równości stron w polskim procesie karnym w perspektywie prawnoporównawczej [The principle of equality of arms in the Polish criminal process from a comparative-law perspective], Kraków: Zakamycze, 2003.

WICZANOWSKA, Hanna. The Adequacy of The Constitutional Complaint as Extraordinary Means of Human Rights Protection - A Comparison of Polish and German Solutions. Torun InternaƟonal Studies. v. 11, n. 1, pp. 5-23. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2018.00

WILIŃSKI, Paweł; Proces karny w świetle Konstytucji [Criminal Trial in the Light of the Constitution]. Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer, pp. 202-220, 2011.

WILIŃSKI, Paweł. Odmowa dostępu do akt sprawy w postępowaniu przygotowawczym [Refusal to grant access to case files in pre-trial proceedings], Prokuratura i Prawo, no. 11, p. 74-85. 2006.