The impact of the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal on the standard of detention on remand in Poland

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.682

Palabras clave:

detention on remand, the Constitutional Tribunal, criminal proceedings, access to a lawyer, access to the file of pre-trial proceedings, Poland

Resumen

Detention on remand is intrinsically linked to the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual and, in particular, to personal freedom, the right to a fair trial and   the principle of the presumption of innocence. This paper explores the constitutional dimension of the application of detention on remand in Poland. Its first part outlines the constitutional values that are violated as a result of detention on remand. The status of the principle of proportionality is pointed out, both in constitutional law and in the criminal law procedure. In further parts, the article presents the role of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland and analyzes its case law on detention on remand. The jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland emphasizes the directive to minimize the duration and the principle of proportionality of preventive measures, which imply that detention on remand may only be used ultima ratio.  In particular, the paper focuses on the rulings concerning the premises for detention on remand, the access to the file of the pre-trial proceedings in the part concerning the decision to apply detention on remand, the access of the persons detained on remand to defense counsels, the duration of detention on remand, and the contact of the persons subject to the most severe preventive measure with their loved ones.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Andrzej Sakowicz, University of Bialystok Faculty of Law, Mickiewicza 1 15-213 Białystok, Poland

    Department of Criminal Procedure

    Faculty of Law,
    Mickiewicza 1
    15-213 Białystok

    Poland

Referencias

BAKER, Estella; HARKIN, Tricia; MITSILEGAS, Valsamis; PERŠAK, Nina. The Need for and Possible Content of EU Pre-trial Detention Rules, Eucrim, 3, pp. 221-229, 2020, https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-020

HERMELIŃSKI, Wojciech; NITA-ŚWIATŁOWSKA, Barbara. Tymczasowe aresztowanie ze względu na grożącą oskarżonemu surową karę (Provisional detention due to the potential severity of penalty). Palestra. n. 6, pp. 14-24. 2018.

HERLIN-KARNELL, Ester. The Power of Comparative Constitutional Law Reasoning in European Criminal Law Procedure. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 2019, vol. 13, p. 1-27, https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2018-0047

JAMRÓZ, Lech. The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland in the Context of Constitutional Judiciary. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Temida 2, 2014.

JASIŃSKI, Wojciech; KREMENS, Karolina. Poland. International Encyclopedia of Laws: Criminal Law. The Netherlands. Kluwer Law International, 2019.

KARDAS, Piotr; WILIŃSKI, Paweł: O niekonstytucyjności odmowy dostępu do akt sprawy w postępowaniu w przedmiocie tymczasowego aresztowania (Concerning the Unconstitutionality of the Refusing to Inspect Files in the Proceeding in Order to Issue a Preliminary Detention). Palestra. n. 7-8, pp. 23-35, 2008.

KLEPCZYŃSKI, Adam; KŁADOCZNY, Piotr; WIŚNIEWSKA, Katarzyna. The Trials of Pre-trial Detention. Report. A review of the existing practice of application of pre-trial detention in Poland. Warsaw: The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, 2019, pp. 7-32

MANCANO, Leandro. The Use of the Charter and Pre-trial Detention in EU Law: Constraints and Possibilities for Better Protection of the Right to Liberty. European Papers. vol. 6. n. 1, pp. 125-139, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/457

MARTUFI, Adriano; PERISTERIDOU Christina. The Purposes of Pre-Trial Detention and the Quest for Alternatives, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 28, n. 2, p. 155, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10002

MCSHERRY, Bernadette. Pretrial and Civil Detention of “Dangerous” Individuals in Common Law Jurisdictions. In: BROWN, Darryl K.; TURNER, Jenia I.; WEISSER, Bettina. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. pp. 522-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.29

MERKEL, Grischa. Detention before Trial and Civil Detention of Dangerous Individuals. In BROWN, Darryl K.; TURNER, Jenia Iontcheva; WEISSER, Bettina. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. p. 508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.28

MORGENSTERN, Christine; Chapter 21 Poland. In: VAN KALMTHOUT, Anton; KNAPEN, Marije; MORGENSTERN, Christine (eds.). Pre-trial Detention in the European Union An Analysis of Minimum Standards in Pre-trial Detention and the grounds for Regular Review in the Member States of the EU. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2009, pp. 717-752.

MORGENSTERN, Christine; KROMREY, Hans. Towards Pre-trial Detention as Ultima Ratio. Available at: https://www.irks.at/detour/DE%201st%20National%20report%20031116.pdf. Accessed on March 12, 2022.

PILITOWSKI, Bartosz. Current practice of applying pre-trial detention in Poland. Report from empirical research, Court Watch Poland Foundation. Available at: https://courtwatch.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/fcwp_PTD_en.pdf Access on: March 13, 2022;

PILITOWSKI, Bartosz. A Measure of Last Resort? The practice of pre-trial detention decision making in the EU. Available at: <https://fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2022/01/A-Measure-of-Last-Resort-Full-Version.pdf>, pp. 67-71. Access on: March 13, 2022

RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

SAKOWICZ, Andrzej. Suspect’s access to a lawyer at an early stage of criminal proceedings in the view the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, vol. 7, n. 3, p. 1979-2009, set./dez. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.565

SKORUPKA, Jerzy. Standard dostępu do informacji o podstawie Dowodowej tymczasowego aresztowania W prawie unii europejskiej i prawie polskim (Standard of Access to Information about the Evidential Base of Provisional Detention in European Union and Polish Law). Przegląd Prawea i Administracji, v. CXX, n. 2, p. 241-253, 2020. https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.120.66

ŚLEDZIŃSKA-SIMON, Anna. Proportionality Analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In KREMNITZER Mordechai; STEINER Talya; LANG Andrej (dds.). Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 385-457, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596268.008

WALTOŚ, Stanisław; HOFMAŃSKI, Piotr. Proces karny [Criminal process], Warszawa: WoltersKluwer, 2020.

WĄSEK-WIADEREK, Małgorzata. Zasada równości stron w polskim procesie karnym w perspektywie prawnoporównawczej [The principle of equality of arms in the Polish criminal process from a comparative-law perspective], Kraków: Zakamycze, 2003.

WICZANOWSKA, Hanna. The Adequacy of The Constitutional Complaint as Extraordinary Means of Human Rights Protection - A Comparison of Polish and German Solutions. Torun InternaƟonal Studies. v. 11, n. 1, pp. 5-23. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2018.00

WILIŃSKI, Paweł; Proces karny w świetle Konstytucji [Criminal Trial in the Light of the Constitution]. Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer, pp. 202-220, 2011.

WILIŃSKI, Paweł. Odmowa dostępu do akt sprawy w postępowaniu przygotowawczym [Refusal to grant access to case files in pre-trial proceedings], Prokuratura i Prawo, no. 11, p. 74-85. 2006.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-04-29

Número

Sección

El rol de los tribunales constitucionales en la determinación del debido proceso

Cómo citar

Sakowicz, A. (2022). The impact of the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal on the standard of detention on remand in Poland. Revista Brasileña De Derecho Procesal Penal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.682