Editorial: Freedom and the Protection of Innocence. Rethinking the Dynamics and Values of the Criminal Trial in Cases of Crime Extinction in the Experience of Adjudication Procedures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v11i2.1258Keywords:
freedom, innocence, fact-finding, crime extinctionAbstract
The present contribution introduces a dossier regarding the relationship between crime extinction, acquittal, and aims of the criminal trial. This paper points out the usefulness of comparative-law method to deal with such complex topic, which it analyses from the viewpoint of the implications of extinctive phenomena on the core values of adjudication procedures. Starting with examining the different ways in which the time factor conditions the qualification of extinctive phenomena according to the approach of each legal system, this study focuses on the evidentiary problems and the dynamics of decision-making, produced by the intervention of such phenomena, which highlight the tension field between procedural efficiency and the protection of freedom and the defendant’s innocence.
Downloads
References
CORDERO, Franco. Procedura penale. Giuffrè: Milano, 1966
FALZEA, Angelo. Accertamento. In: ID., Voci di teoria generale del diritto. Giuffrè: Milano, 1970
FALZEA, Angelo. Efficacia giuridica. In: ID., Voci di teoria generale del diritto. Giuffrè: Milano, 1970
GIANGRECO, Mattia. Il contraddittorio anticipato e la libertà su cauzione. Verso un modello cautelare più garantista. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: Napoli, 2024
LO GIUDICE, Alessio. Giudicare in ipotesi e rinunciare al giudizio non sono la stessa cosa. A partire dal caso limite del reato estinto. La legislazione penale 2021 (disponibile in https://www.lalegislazionepenale.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Lo-Giudice.pdf)
NEGRI, Daniele. Dell’improcedibilità temporale. Pregi e difetti. Sistema penale n. 2, 2022, pp. 51-63 (https://sistemapenale.it/pdf_contenuti/1645393666_negri-2022a-improcedibilita-temporale-riforma-cartabia.pdf)
NEGRI, Daniele. Fumus commissi delicti. La prova per le fattispecie cautelari. Giappichelli: Torino, 2004
PAEFFGEN, Hans-Ullrich. Vorüberlegungen zu einer Dogmatik des Untersuchungshaft-Rechts. Carl Heymanns: Mainz, 1986
ROMANO, Mario. Sub pre-art. 150. In: ROMANO, Mario, GRASSO, Giovanni, PADOVANI, Tullio, Commentario sistematico del codice penale. vol. III. Giuffrè: Milano, 1994
SCHÜNEMANN, Bernd. El propio sistema de la teoría del delito. InDret n. 1, 2008 (disponible in https://indret.com/wp-content/themes/indret/pdf/505.pdf)
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Typology of Transjudicial Communication. University of Richmond Law Review 1994, v. 29, n. 1, pp. 99-137 (disponibile ora in https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232781656.pdf)
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data Availability Statement: In compliance with open science policies, all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stefano Ruggeri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As of 2022, articles published in the RDPP are licensed under Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. rticles published until 2021 adopted the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
How to Cite
